Indus Valley & Prehistoric Cultures
This topic covers India's prehistoric cultures — Palaeolithic, Mesolithic, Neolithic, Chalcolithic and megalithic — and the Harappan civilisation: its extent and phases, town planning, economy, society, seals and script, art, site signatures, and decline.
Concepts
- Stone Age tool traditions and subsistence: The Palaeolithic, Mesolithic and Neolithic stages, each marked by its own tool-making tradition and way of getting food, from hunting and gathering towards settled farming.
- Chalcolithic and megalithic cultures: Copper-using farming cultures and the later megalithic burial cultures, each known through excavated sites. Burzahom, Inamgaon, Ganeshwar and Mangadu are among the named sites studied across this prehistoric and early metal-using span.
- Harappan extent and chronology: The geographical spread of the civilisation and its division into pre-Harappan, mature and late phases, each phase with its own character and span.
- Harappan town planning: The grid street layout, the division between a raised citadel and a lower town, covered drainage systems, and structures identified as granaries.
- Harappan economy: Farming, specialised craft production, and trade both within the Harappan zone and outward, including contact with Mesopotamia.
- Society and the limits of the evidence: What the archaeological remains show about occupations and social or political organisation — and, just as importantly, how far that evidence can be pushed before it stops supporting a conclusion.
- Seals and the undeciphered script: The carved seals and the writing on them, which has not been deciphered, so claims about what Harappan texts say remain unsettled.
- Harappan art and craft: Terracotta figurines, the bronze Dancing Girl made by lost-wax casting, carnelian bead-work, and pottery — each object tied to its own material and technique.
- Site-specific signatures: Features that major sites are known for: Dholavira's water management and reservoirs, Lothal's dockyard, Kalibangan's ploughed field and fire altars, Rakhigarhi's scale, and Mohenjo-daro and Harappa as type sites.
- Theories of Harappan decline: Proposed explanations for the civilisation's end, including climatic change and river shifts, along with the debate over how far there was real discontinuity.
What Understanding Means
- Match each named object to its exact material and technique rather than to the general average of Harappan craft.
- Place each named prehistoric, Chalcolithic or megalithic site in its correct culture and tool-and-subsistence stage.
- Link each named site across the topic to its own state, monument type and headline feature, avoiding a neighbouring region, a swapped type or another site's fame.
- Read an archaeological finding for only what it strictly entails, rejecting a plausible-sounding social conclusion it does not support.
- Sort Harappan material into its pre-Harappan, mature and late phases, and set out the competing explanations offered for the decline.